On 4 fév, 18:26, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 3, 7:17 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I'm considering writing a little interpreter for a python-like > > language and I'm looking for name suggestions. :-) > > > Basically, I don't want to change a whole lot about Python. In fact, > > I see myself starting with the compiler module from Python 2.5 and > > building from there. > > > This language would be more or less "Python modulo a few > > (incompatible) changes, but it'd be recognizable by Python > > programmers. I'm talking about stuff like "allowing the character '?' > > in identifier names," and "a better way to express 'for dummy in > > xrange (n):' when the index isn't needed." I'd also like to > > implement most of the planned Python 3000 changes. > > > Any suggestions? I'm thinking "Ophidian," for the snake connection, > > or, possibly, "Circus," from "Monty Python's Flying Circus." > > > Thanks :-) > > What about "Argh!". Sounds like Paul Grahams Arc but is more Monty > Pythonesque than "Circus".
Lol ! And +1, BTW -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
