Steve Holden wrote:
> Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
>> Bjoern Schliessmann schrieb:
>>> mario ruggier wrote:
>>>
>>>> It may sometimes be useful to make use of the conceptual
>>>> difference between these two cases, that is that in one case the
>>>> user did not specify any key and in the other the user explicitly
>>>> specified the key to be None.
>>> Do you have an example where this might be useful?
>>
>> Any situation in which there would otherwise lots of documentation
>> needed to inform the user that the sentinel value is something else
>> than None.
>>
>> Take something like this as an example:
>>
>> def update_user(some, values, nullable_value=sentinel):
>> # first, work with some and values
>> ...
>> # then, on something actually being passed to nullable_value
>> if nullable_value is not sentinel:
>> connection.cursor().execute("update table set value = ?",
>> nullable_value)
>>
>>
>>
>> I've seen this before, in code from e.g. Alex Martelli.
>>
> Sure, but the OP's question was "Is there any way to tell between
> whether a keyword arg has been explicitly specified (to the same value
> as the default for it)". We've drifted a long way from that, since the
> code you demonstrate doesn't detect an explicit call with
> nullable_value==sentinel -- the reason being, I submit, that there is no
> use case for such code.
The code above works on the assumption that the value named sentinel
is completely out-of-band, and no user has any reason to use the
sentinel object in a call. An example up-thread uses a
uniquely-constructed instance of object for this. I kind of like
defining a class, because I get a docstring to explain what's going on.
Mel.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
