On Jan 31, 3:09 pm, Paul Rubin <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > mysets = [set(range(x[2],x[1])) for x in mylist] > > This is pretty horrible, each set can be arbitrarily large, > i.e. if x[2] and x[1] are 0 and 1000000, you get a set with > a million elements.
True... Any lighter-weight implementation of sets out there? That is, one that would defer use of resources until actually needed -- somewhat akin to the distinction between range and xrange, and so on. xset? -- Regards, Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
