On 29 Jan., 17:00, "Chris Mellon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the difficulty of statically analyzing Python, and the > limitations you need to add for either static typing or type inference > to be practical, I think that the real future for faster Python code > is JIT, not static optimizations. Python has a JIT right now - so why do you think it's Pythons "real future"? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
