Wildemar Wildenburger schrieb:
> André wrote:
>> Personally, I like the idea you suggest, with the modification that I
>> would use "." instead of "@", as in
>>
>> class Server(object):
>> def __init__(self, .host, .port, .protocol, .bufsize, .timeout):
>> pass
>>
> I like :)
>
> However, you can probably cook up a decorator for this (not certain, I'm
> not a decorator Guru), which is not that much worse.
>
> Still, I'd support that syntax (and the general idea.).
Just for the fun of it, I implemented a decorator:
from functools import *
from inspect import *
def autoassign(_init_):
@wraps(_init_)
def _autoassign(self, *args, **kwargs):
argnames, _, _, _ = getargspec(_init_)
for name, value in zip(argnames[1:], args):
setattr(self, name, value)
_init_(self, *args, **kwargs)
return _autoassign
class Test(object):
@autoassign
def __init__(self, foo, bar):
pass
t = Test(10, 20)
print t.bar
Diez
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
