Dan Stromberg wrote: > The author of the bag class said that he was planning to submit bags for > inclusion in 2.5 - is there a particular reason why they didn't go in? > I wouldn't know. Not enough convincing use cases, I guess. Fools ;)
> I keep finding a need for bags. In the past, I've done this sort of > thing with dictionaries, but it's much nicer to have a bag class, and of > course it's better to have it in the standard library than to slurp it > into this, that and the other project. > Then again, it is only one class. Also, if I may be so bold, why wouldn't a simple list fit your needs (other than performance, of course)? /W -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
