On Jan 10, 12:04 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the most part, I agree with you, which is why I chose Python in > the first place. I like quick development. Unfortunately, this is > one of those cases where execution time is a factor. Who knows, maybe > someone who's done camera vision with Python will come in and say it's > just the algorithm in the example that needs work (I'm crossing my > fingers that that's the case).
It would probably be worth reposting your question with a different subject line. Something along the lines of "Image/Video processing performance in Python", and explaining what you actually want to achieve. "Python too slow?" doesn't give enough information - clearly Python is fast enough for many many tasks, since it is so widely used. It also sounds like a troll - so many people who would actually be able to assist you (such as the PIL, pygame and numpy/scipy communities) may have ignored this thread. Cheers, -- Ant. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
