On Jan 8, 2008 12:35 PM, Martin Vilcans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/7/08, Guilherme Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/1/7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Anything written somewhere that's thorough? Any code body that should > > > serve as a reference? > > > > PEP 8 > > http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/ > > The problem with PEP 8 is that even code in the standard libraries > doesn't follow the recommendations regarding the naming of functions > for example. The recommendation is to_separate_words_with_underscore, > but some code uses lowerCamelCase instead. > > I tended to dislike the underscore convention, but after forcing > myself to use it for a while I'm starting to appreciate its beauty.
Conventions get broken when there's a good reason, e.g., elegant looking "deque" instead of clumsy looking "Deque". -- Neil Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list