On Jan 5, 5:12 pm, Paul Hankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 5, 4:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Jan 5, 5:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > Hello, Paul and Arnaud.
> > > While I think about your answers: do you think there is any way to
> > > avoid shuffle?
> > > It may take unnecessary long on a long list most of whose elements
> > > have the property.
>
> You could generate a random shuffle of range(len(seq)) lazily, and use
> that to iterate over your sequence.
>
> import random
> import itertools
>
> def randxrange(n):
> "Generate the numbers 0 to n-1 in a random order"
> x = range(n)
> for i in xrange(n):
> r = random.randrange(n - i)
> yield x[r]
> x[r] = x[n - i - 1]
>
> def shuffled(seq):
> "Generate the elements of seq in a random order"
> return (seq[i] for i in randxrange(len(seq)))
>
> def pick_random(seq, prop):
> return itertools.ifilter(prop, shuffled(seq)).next()
At the risk of filling this thread with my posts, here's a much
simplified and faster version of this code that uses no extra storage.
import random
def pick_random(seq, prop):
L = len(seq)
for i in xrange(L):
r = random.randrange(L - i)
if prop(seq[r]):
return seq[r]
seq[r] = seq[L - i - 1]
--
Paul Hankin
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
