Ming wrote:
> TypeError: Error when calling the metaclass bases > Cannot create a consistent method resolution > order (MRO) for bases A, B > > (I submitted the problem to the author but I'm not sure I'll ever hear > back.) I'm guessing that this kind of diamond inheritance is > prohibited by the interpreter, and that his lack of error messages > from the interpretation is due to actually leaving out the "class > B(A): pass" or, alternatively, leaving out the (object) in the first class definition: >>> class A: pass ... >>> class B(A): pass ... >>> class D(A, B): pass ... >>> </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
