[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Further experimentation showed that derivation from object was the > culprit; new-style objects are not considered "instances" in the above > sense. I wasn't able to figure out a workaround. Is there one, or is > the distinction between traditional classes and built-in types only > going to get more and more hazy?
new-style classes *are* types. one way to test for a new-style object is to compare type(obj) to obj.__class__; if they point to the same object, it's a new-style object. </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
