Xif wrote:
> Here's a problem with relative imports:
>
> Suppose I have a package called some_package (in a separate directory
> included in the PYTHONPATH, with an __init__.py file etc.)
>
> This package has a module inside the directory, called "database", and
> therefore residing in the file some_package/database.py.
>
> Now, what if there's another module, for example inside the
> site-packages directory, with the same file name (i.e. database.py)?
>
> We have a problem. Since although these modules have
> different absolute
> names ("some_package.database" for the first module, and just
> "database" for the second), when I try to do
>
> import database
>
> from inside some_package, it first of all tries to find the matching
> file in the some_package directory (i.e. do a relative import). Since
> it first checks the some_package directory, and finds database.py
> there,
>
> import database
>
> in fact imports the module with the absolute name
> some_package.database.
>
> This is problemat on two levels:
>
> 1) It is surprising and undesirable that "import database" in effect
> may do two completely different things ("import some_package.database"
> or "import database") depending on an external, unpredictable factor:
> the existence of a database.py file inside the some_package directory.
>
> 2) It effectively prevents you from naming a module inside a package
> with the same name of any module in the "root" PYTHONPATH directories.
> In my example, there's no sane way I can see of having
> some_package.database if there's already a database module
> (database.py
> file) in any PYTHONPATH directory.
>
> Are my observations correct? Is there something I ignored? Should
> this be posted somewhere else?
Short answer: don't use relative imports:
from some_package import database
http://docs.python.org/ref/import.html
Robert Brewer
MIS
Amor Ministries
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
