I think we are a ways off from the point where any of the solutions are well used, matured, and trusted to promote as a Python standard module. I'd love to see it happen, but even worse than it never happening is it happening too soon.
On Dec 27, 2007 8:52 AM, Emin.shopper Martinian.shopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Experts, > > Is there any hope of a parallel processing toolkit being incorporated into > the python standard library? I've seen a wide variety of toolkits each with > various features and limitations. Unfortunately, each has its own API. For > coarse-grained parallelism, I suspect I'd be pretty happy with many of the > existing toolkits, but if I'm going to pick one API to learn and program to, > I'd rather pick one that I'm confident is going to be supported for a while. > > So is there any hope of adoption of a parallel processing system into the > python standard library? If not, is there any hope of something like the > db-api for coarse grained parallelism (i.e, a common API that different > toolkits can support)? > > Thanks, > -Emin > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- Read my blog! I depend on your acceptance of my opinion! I am interesting! http://ironfroggy-code.blogspot.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
