Proginoskes wrote: > On Dec 20, 4:29 pm, Dustan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Dec 20, 8:24 am, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:04:48 -0800, Dustan wrote: >>>> On Dec 20, 1:05 am, Proginoskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> I myself prefer the 0.81818181... Truth Movement. >>>> More precisely, 0.81818181818181823. >>> Hm... >>> In [59]: '%.60f' % (9 / 11.0) >>> Out[59]: '0.818181818181818232282864755688933655619621276855468750000000' > > Only using double precision. Weenie. > >> Whoa... I only just realized, this was cross-posted to four other >> groups. [...] > > And we have comprehension! > > Other posts about 9/11 to sci.math are likely to receive the same > treatment. > > --- Christopher Heckman
And what is the answer to 818181818/1000000007 or about 0.8181818122727273140909088013636383904545312668182811... ? David Bernier -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
