On Dec 19, 12:01 pm, Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They should have converted the > old-style to new when they decided to derive from both types (it's not > like that's terribly difficult).
Unless perhaps the old-style class is part of an stdlib or 3rd party (or rather 4th party since "they" are the 3rd party here ;-)) module. Even if it's technically possible and the change doesn't break other things, I'd rather not have to maintain a patched version of the stdlib. George -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list