On Dec 10, 2007 5:56 AM, Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 10, 6:26 am, Tim Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So you say there is not any trusted way? > > > > You cannot distribute any program with the expectation that it > > cannot be reverse engineered. > [snip] > > > >From the OP's post, it seemed likely to me that the OP was asked by a > misguided management to make sure it was "reverse-engineer-proof". So > any attempt to convince the OP may be aimed at the wrong person. > > Misguided as they are, sometimes you have to placate these people. > So, are there any ways to make it "harder" to reverse engineer a > program? > >
Just telling them you did is at least as effective as anything else. Anyone who knows enough to know that you're lying knows why it's impossible. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
