Lou Pecora a écrit : > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>Thus: close; >>>could replace close();
*Please* give proper attribution. I'd *never* suggest such a thing. > > Wouldn't this give an ambiguity? > > afcn=close # make an "alias" to the close function > val=close() # set val to the return value of the close function > The point of Colin (who was the one making this suggestion) was that parens could be omitted if there was no LHS. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
