On Dec 8, 2:51 pm, Glenn Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 8, 7:44 pm, MonkeeSage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think it muddies the water to say that a.a() and a.a are the same > > thing--obviously they are not. > > A thing is not what it is; > A thing is what it does. > This is the Way of the Duck. > > -- Basho (in his "3 extra syllables" phase)
Bah. Type-by-behavior never impressed me much. And I still think that a.a is semantically different from a.a() in python. Regards, Jordan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
