J. Robertson wrote: > Francesco Pietra wrote: >> I was trying to suggest a more specific mail-list in order not to be >> floaded. I >> am the opinion that python-list@python.org is very informative and useful, >> though it is hard to find the time for so many mails. >> f. > > I agree with Francesco: Python is increasingly used in sciences (or, at > least, I use it increasingly :-) and it would be of some use to have a > communication channel focused on this: there are a few mailing lists for > specific niche topics (CAD, XML) already, so sciences could be one more. > > There are mailing lists for numpy/scipy, f2py, VTK and the rest of it, > but nothing quite like what Francesco suggests, as far as I know.
Such things are considered on-topic for scipy-user or even numpy-discussion. http://www.scipy.org/Mailing_Lists -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
