Carl K wrote: > jay graves wrote: >> On Sep 21, 2:43 am, Tim Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Carl K wrote: >>>> It seems there are 2 odbc modules - pyOdbc and mxOdbc - anyone know the >>>> difference? >>> In short, pyodbc is open source; mxOdbc requires a commercial license. >>> pyodbc is a newcomer, but appears to work for everything I've thrown >>> at it (which is not much). mxOdbc has been around longer, and is sure >>> to be a more mature product. It may offer more features & functionality. >> There is also a brand new module 'ceODBC'. >> http://ceodbc.sourceforge.net/ >> >> I haven't used it yet but I want to give it a try. > > I tried it, and it worked better than pyodbc. (better is not exactly right. > there was some weird bug in the ctree odbc driver, and the author of ceODBC > gave > me a workaround.)
All right, I'm a little perplexed as to whether "better" here refers to the admirable response of the ceOBDC author or to some other factors which demonstrate ceODBC's superiority. I've not really got the opportunity to pit them against each other so to speak, but I'd love to hear from someone who had. TJ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
