On Nov 22, 5:46 pm, Stargaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 03:24:48 -0800, cokofreedom wrote: > > On Nov 22, 10:58 am, "Guilherme Polo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 2007/11/22, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> > alf wrote: > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > I wonder why it is an invalid syntax: > > >> > > >>> if 1: if 1: if 1: print 1 > >> > > File "<stdin>", line 1 > >> > > if 1: if 1: if 1: print 1 > > >> > > or > > >> > > >>> if 1: for i in range(10): print i > >> > > File "<stdin>", line 1 > >> > > if 1: for i in range(10): print i > > >> > > I would expect one could nest : > > >> > Although I agree it might be quit unreadable for normal programmers, > >> > people who are used to writing math formula, (i.e. MatLab), this is > >> > not true. > > >> > Here another interesting one, that is accepted: > > >> > self.nodes.extend ( [ ONode(shape,n,self) \ > >> > for n in range(shape.Parent.N_Outputs) > >> > \ if shape.Type_Outputs[n] == type ] ) > > >> That is a list comprehension > > >> > cheers, > >> > Stef > >> > -- > >> >http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > > >> -- > >> -- Guilherme H. Polo Goncalves > > > So acceptable usage (though disgusting :P) would be > > > while 1: print 'hello'; print 'goodbye'; exec(rm -rf *) > > Nope:: > > exec(rm -rf *) > ^ > SyntaxError: invalid syntax > > Even the syntactically correct ``exec("rm -rf *")`` would make your > computer explode. Should we introduce this as a shortcut to `break`? ;-) > > SCNR, > stargaming
Haha, you are correct. I was tempted to actually trial and error the code too much... I feel it is an important thing to present to a new user however, much like the infinite "alert message" because of their infinite loop. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
