Michele Simionato wrote: > On Nov 21, 10:23 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I can only guess - but I'd say if you can do >> >> foo.removeHandler(h) >> >> you can do >> >> foo.removeHandler(h) >> h.close() >> >> easily. But not >> >> foo.removeHandler(h) # implicit closing >> bar.addHandler(h) >> >> It does kind of make sense if you decouple the life-cycles IMHO. >> >> Diez > > But what is the use case for removing an handler without closing it?
Having thought more about this, it _has_ to be that way - think of one handler attached to several loggers. Removing AND closing it from one would render it useless for others. You can't want that to happen. Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
