On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:13:17 -0800, Chris M wrote: >> > Status: Rejected >> >> Thank you for pointing out the obvious. But *truly* helpful would be >> insight into "While at some point I expect that Python will have >> interfaces." Look for that sentence under the "rejected" part. >> >> James >> >> -- >> James Stroud >> UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics Box 951570 >> Los Angeles, CA 90095 >> >> http://www.jamesstroud.com > > Then answer his question yourself instead of wasting everyones bandwidth > going on some moral crusade. There's something to be said about users > with signatures longer than their messages...
Speaking of wasting bandwidth, please snip out the parts of the post you're replying to that are no longer relevant. Also, you may notice that James *did* answer the question, pointing out the relevant parts of the PEP that you neglected to mention. Note too that James' signature is seventy-three characters SHORTER than his message. There's something to be said about users who, having made an unhelpful and almost pointless post, then follow it up by spewing venom and bile at the person who made a gentle and reasonable comment about that unhelpfulness. I guess some people just can't take criticism, no matter how well-founded or how gently it is put. -- Steven. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
