On Nov 13, 2007 3:18 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 9, 5:36 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > En Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:25:17 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > > One should make a lot of assumptions about your code because it's not > > complete. Please post a minimal complete example showing your problem. > > > It's a rather large program. My assumption was that just posting the > snippet around the call site and the callee pathetic attempt > to extract interp would be sufficient :( > The creation of a minimal runnable sample is a fantastic way to find any bugs in your code, and has the benefit of (if the bug is not in your code) giving other people a simple way to recreate the bug. If I were to check this (and I'm not, but I would if you'd posted runnable code) I'll have to write the code myself from your textual description. Then, if the code works, I'll have to post the code that I wrote as well as my negative response, and go through several back and forths trying to isolate any differences between what I wrote and what you wrote but didn't show. That's way more work than I'm willing to do to solve someone else's problem. In my experience, creating a minimal sample that demonstrates the bug will lead you to the actual bug more than half the time. That's a lot of time (yours and other peoples) that can be saved if you do it. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
