"Bruno Desthuilliers" wrote: >functions are *not* methods of their module.
Now I am confused - if I write: result = foo.bar(param) Then if foo is a class, we probably all agree that bar is a method of foo. But the same syntax would work if I had imported some module as foo. So what's the difference ? Why can't bar be called a method of foo, or is it merely a convention that classes have methods and modules have functions? Note that I am purposely refraining from mentioning a module that has a class that has a method. - Hendrik -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
