Peter Mayne wrote:
Peter Hansen wrote:
and it's still a bad idea in almost all cases anyway
Since I've been playing with PyQt lately...
Is qt not one of the "almost all" cases? From the limited number of
examples I've seen, it seems to be common to do
from qt import *
This sort of thing seems common amongst large frameworks such
as PyQt or wxPython. This is unfortunate, IMHO, though it isn't
really a serious concern for most users.
I'm grateful that the most recent versions of wxPython have
abandoned that approach in favour of a nice clean "import wx",
and as far as I can tell the code does not suffer as a result,
and gains substantially in clarity. Maybe the "qt" module
defines far fewer names than the "wx" module does, but I for
one am glad not to have to worry that I won't accidentally
conflict with the hundreds that are there (in wx), nor to
worry that my code lacks in readability.
Since most of the imported names start with "Q", are called QLabel,
QSlider, etc, and are generally recognisable in context, this would seem
to be a reasonable case of namespace pollution.
I'm certainly not arguing with the general premise, just wondering if qt
is one of the sensible exceptions.
If not sensible, at least fairly widely accepted, not a serious
impediment to effective use, and definitely not without precedent.
-Peter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
