2007/10/26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Oct 26, 8:53 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin Marcher wrote: > Thanks for the NUCULAR mention (http://nucular.sourceforge.net). It > certainly doesn't meet all the requirements requested (very few users > yet, some features missing). Please give it a look, however. It's easy to > use > and fast. How fast it is compared to others I can't say, especially > since some of the numbers I see quoted out there are really incredible (how > can an indexer by faster than "cp"?) -- I suspect some sort of > trickery, > frankly.
For starters I think I will go with nucular. It seems good enough, lightweight and easy to use. > Anyway, if you want a feature like proximity searching or > some sort of internationalization support (it works with unicode, but > that's probably not enough), please let me know. I focused on > the core indexing and retrieval functionality, and I think a lot of > additional features can be added easily. I don't know much about the internals of search engines but I'll probably report back with a few suggestions after some time of usage :) -- http://noneisyours.marcher.name http://feeds.feedburner.com/NoneIsYours -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
