Robert Dailey wrote: > On 10/21/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No, I literally meant that the Python C API is object-oriented. >> You don't need an object-oriented language to write object-oriented >> code. > > I disagree with this statement. C is not an object oriented language, > and I've seen attempts to make it somewhat object oriented, however it > failed miserably in readability and manageability overhead. However, > this isn't the place to discuss such a thing so I've got nothing more > to say than that.
Guess you haven't programmed in GTK+ on C, then. Very heavy in object-oriented programmin. C++'s OOP stuff is just pure syntactic sugar, nothing more, nothing less. Python's OO nature is a bit deeper, since we're talking a dynamic language. Scheme, another dynamic language, is not inherently OO or non-OO. You can use it in either fashion. > > I do appreciate you taking the time to respond to my inquiry and offer > a few C++ wrapper API's for the Python C API. Take care! Any C++ version of the python API is by definition going to be a wrapper around the C version. Even the C version is a wrapper around the python object model. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
