On Oct 9, 3:35 pm, Istvan Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > why would it be late? is the future of you own work not worth the time > it takes to rename it? Compared to all the other work it took ... it > is just a mere inconvenience.
>From a sourceforge perspective I think it's more than in inconvenience -- in fact I'm not sure it can be done -- unless I get on the phone with the guys over there and beg for some special exception or something. [btw, I like using sourceforge: lot's of neat packaged services; no real complaints.] The approved http://nucular.sourceforge.net and I don't think they'll approve another project with the same description. > ....people who invent a name will have a hard time accepting > that it is bad. Well I'd like people to use the software because they think it's good. If the name is a problem it's probably only the first of many reasons they won't want to use it or will not like it because it doesn't match their preconceptions. But if there's some way to change the name easily in the next week or so, I'll consider it anyway. hints? -- Aaron Watters === Why do you hang out with that sadist? Beats me! -- Kliban -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
