This William D Clinger is a YANK MOTHER F*CKER, a 911 controlled
demolition operator group member or a ROGUE bastard in FBI whose
job and RACIST tendency is to CONTROL FREEDOM of information.
These MOTHERF*CKERS using fake accounts use "FULL LONG NAMES"
to FOOL simple and honest people that they are some genuine
people. They have multiple accounts and their sole job is to
derail conversations on the threads where there is exchange of
knowledge. That is their FULL TIME JOB. They use ebooks from
where they cut and paste to look they have multiple specialities
but this could be even 3 bastards working full time daily with
150 nicks and accounts all automated.

Please look at my articles on google. just click my profile on
groups.google.com to find out the potent truth I have written.

I am sure you have seen that video of a student being tasered
in University of Florida because these bastards hate our freedoms.

These are corporatist bastards whose whole goal is to keep the
public ignorant. THESE MOTHERFUCKERS hid the anthrax mailer who
was really one of them. THE FBI Bastards never caught the anthrax
mailer based in the USA>

On Oct 8, 1:55 am, William D Clinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The gnuist wrote:
> > Many years ago I went to an MIT prof on a technique I had become aware
> > of. Its not McCarthy. When I asked him for his class notes on the
> > subject to self-study, first he stared at me as if I was some kind of
> > thief. Then as we were coming down to the first floor of the high
> > voltage lab, I asked him why didnt he publish it? He said, and these
> > are exact words: "you can make us as much guilty as you want, but we
> > did not publish it."
>
> An MIT prof who is not fluent in English and is also not
> McCarthy?  That narrows it down.
>
> > You may want to be clear about SI and SC.
> > what language is source interpreter written in?
> > what language is source compiler written in?
>
> It doesn't matter.
>
> > I would actually prefer that there was no environment
> > available like no C compiler.
>
> That doesn't matter either.
>
> > All the processes would have to be created.
> > Plz note that I am neither a CS nor a logician.
>
> Nor does that.
>
> > I prefer detailed treatment of this subject that is actually useful.
>
> It would be hard to improve upon the advice that Jens gave
> you.  I will add this:  If you don't have a compiler SC for
> the language in which SI is written, then you have to write
> SC before you hand-simulate it (or execute it, if you happen
> to have a compiler for the language in which SC is written).
>
> I will also add this:  If SC is written in the same language
> as SI, then hand-simulating SC on SC itself gives you an
> executable compiler, which you can then use to compile SI.
>
> Been there, done that.
>
> Will


-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to