Bent C Dalager wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bent C Dalager) writes: >> >>> I have never claimed equivalence. What I have made claims about are >>> the properties of one of the meanings of a word. Specifically, my >>> claim is that "free" is a reasonable description of some one or some >>> thing that has been "liberated". >> But it suggests that the natural state would be the unfree state. > > Would this be a good thing? Would it be a bad thing? What is your > point?
"There's no easy way to be free." "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." Freedom is not natural. It must be defended. -- Lew -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
