Ken Tilton a écrit : > > > Matthias Benkard wrote: > >>> So this has nothing to >>> do with freedom in /any/ sense of the word, it has to do with a >>> political agenda opposed to the idea of private property. >> >> Freedom is inherently political, you know. You're condemning the FSF >> for being political, although the FSF's stated purpose is a political >> one. > > Oh, I missed that. I just saw something about software should be shared > and programmers should be content with an hourly wage, not sales. > Nothing forces you to use GPL code, isn't it ? If that code was under a proprietary licence, you would not use it without paying the price, because then you'd be *stealing* code ? And since you have a deep respect for intellectual property, copyright laws etc, you would not, by any mean, *steal* code by not respecting the licence terms ? Do we agree on this ? Yes ? Fine. Then how dare you complain about the fact that the GPL don't let you steal code ? Don't you feel something like a contradiction here ? Too bad that you can't have your cake and eat it too...
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
