On 9/28/07, TheFlyingDutchman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 28, 2:49 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > TheFlyingDutchman wrote: > >
> > All serious languages are turing-complete. So can we put away with this > > non-sense argument right away, please? > > You said it was a most basic language feature. I still haven't heard > anything that leads me to believe that statement is correct. What > languages implemented decorators as a most basic language feature? > Python didn't have them for over a decade so it doesn't qualify. > Decorators are syntax sugar for higher order functions. Higher order functions are a both a basic and a fundamental language feature, and exist in many languages. The fact that you don't know this just proves, once again, that you like to talk more than you like to learn. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
