On 9/25/07, Mark Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since the sorteddict's data is always kept in key order, indexes
> (integer offsets) into the sorteddict make sense. Five additional
> methods are proposed to take advantage of this:
>
> key(index : int) -> value
>
> item(index : int) -> (key, value)
>
> value(index : int) -> key
>
> set_value(index : int, value)
>
> delete(index : int)
But what about using non-sequential integer keys (something I do quite often)?
e.g. sorteddict({1:'a', 3:'b': 5:'c', 99:'d'})[3] should return 'b', not 'd'.
Andrew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
