Ron Adam a écrit : > > > TheFlyingDutchman wrote: > >> I am not talking about the way it does it, but rather, the way it >> could do it or... could have done it. That requires no knowledge of >> how the interpreter currently does it unless I am proposing something >> that no interpreter in the world could ever do. > (snip) > So if you can find a way to do things like removing self in python in > such a way that it doesn't require adding more to the Core interpreter, > then it might be considered.
By who ? As far as I'm concerned, I don't want 'self' to be removed, and I'm probably not the only one here. > > What I've found is as my skills improve, I take more advantage of being > able to modify and/or introspect how things work. This allows more > choices on how I might solve a particular problem. The changes required by removing self would make most of this either painfull or near impossible AFAICT. > I also think there a lots of improvements that could be made to other > parts of python such as the libraries that would be of much more > practical benefit. indeed. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
