Ben Finney wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) writes: > >> In general, "a superclass of foo" means "a class X such that foo is a >> sublass of X" > > Sure. However, this doesn't equate to the assertion that "next class > in the MRO is the superclass", which is what I was responding to. > One thing not pointed out in this thread is that the chain of classes on the MRO starting with super(A, obj) _will_ include all superclasses of A. That is the guarantee of the MRO, and that is why super is an appropriate name.
-Scott David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
