Nathan Harmston a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I guess my description was a bit rubbish in retrospec, I dont even
> think the title of my email made sense....it doesnt to me now:
>
> class Manager(object):
> def __init__(self):
> pass
> def dosomething(self):
> return "RESULTS"
>
> class Foo(object):
> def __init__(self):
> self.a = "NEE"
>
> What I m trying to do is end up with the following syntax:
>
> f = Foo() # instantiates a Foo object
> g= Foo.objects.dosomething() # returns "RESULTS"
>
> The best way I ve found of doing this is overriding new
>
> class Foo(object):
> def __new__(cls, *args, **kw):
> cls.objects = Manager()
>
You're obviously overcomplexifying things here...
# the canonical pythonic way
class Foo(object):
objects = Manager()
def __init__(self):
self.a = "NEE"
# the monkeypatch way
class Foo(object):
def __init__(self):
self.a = "NEE"
Foo.objects = Manager()
HTH
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
