fanbanlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Which XSLT processor is the most reliable? > > requirement: > + must support Python 2.4 > + must run w/ Windows (and Linux) > + not super slow
I've had success with libxslt [1] (and libxml2 [2]) on Linux with Python 2.3.x and earlier, and I imagine that it's portable enough to work successfully on Windows and has already been tested with Python 2.4. Moreover, I don't think many people complain about the performance of libxslt/libxml2. ;-) If you find the supplied Python bindings for libxml2 either "un-Pythonic" or insufficiently DOM-like, you might want to try lxml [3] or libxml2dom [4]. Paul [1] http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ [2] http://www.xmlsoft.org/ [3] http://www.xml.com/cs/user/view/cs_msg/2280 [4] http://www.python.org/pypi?:action=display&name=libxml2dom -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
