On Aug 24, 12:38 am, tooru honda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. Does shuffle() produce uniform result ?
If you're worried about this microscopic bias (on the order of 2**-53), then shuffle more than once. That will distribute the bias more evenly: def super_shuffle(sequence): for i in range(10): shuffle(sequence) Raymond Hettinger -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list