[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> While I agree that Bruno's response was perhaps needlessly snippy, your >> original question was needlessly inflammatory, as if you somehow wanted >> some "religious zealot" to act the way Bruno did. If we start labeling >> people, this thread will earn you a label that rhymes with "roll". >> > That is correct. I did word it in a way that would hook the Bruno's of > the group. But I will probably have some more important questions so I > will word it differently in the future. Such as: I wish they were not > getting rid of dict.has_key() in Python 3, which I prefer to IN. > > Well, again Python gives you the flexibility to define your own dict subclass that has a has_key() method with the obvious implementation.
But why would you want to ignore built-in support like "value in dict"? regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden --------------- Asciimercial ------------------ Get on the web: Blog, lens and tag the Internet Many services currently offer free registration ----------- Thank You for Reading ------------- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
