On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:07:12 +0200, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Jean-Paul Calderone schrieb: >> On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:16:04 +0200, "Diez B. Roggisch" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> vml schrieb: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> >>>> I am trying to promote python in my job, my collegue only see matlab >>>> and microsoft scripting language. >>>> I understood that there willl be no backward compatibility between >>>> python 2.x and 3.0, does it means that: >>>> >>> [snip] >>> >>> You mean C#, the language that has seen 3 major revisions in the last 6 >>> years of existence, with C# 3 being announced already? And the .NET SDK, >>> that happily strode along with that? Compared to python, that has been >>> started in 1991 and now approaches it's third incarnation, I'd say >>> python has a record of steadiness that surpasses that of MS-based tools >>> by any means. >> >> This is not a valid comparison. In fact, C# 3 is completely backwards >> compatible with C# 2, just as C# 2 was backwards compatible with C# 1. > >Does that also apply to the SDK? >
I'm not really sure what the answer to that is. I presume so, but perhaps someone who has more C# experience can chime in. Jean-Paul -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
