> I'd like to do it in one line because what I am trying to do is, after > all, a single, simple enough action. I find the suggested > b = sorted(a.keys()) much more readable than breaking it up in two > lines.
I think you have demonstrated that a single-line statements with multiple functions and methods is *not* more readable for you, contrary to your own beliefs. You were aware that sort is "in-place", and recognized that b = d.keys().sort() does not "work". What you here failed to recognize is that b is assigned the result of .sort(), not the result of .keys(). You then made the same mistake again in thinking that b=copy.copy(d.keys()).sort() should work better, because it sorts a copy - still failing to see that it is again the result of .sort() that gets assigned to b. So ISTM that you got puzzled by the order in which multiple things happen when written into a single line. My guess would be that methods are particularly puzzling, more so than functions (which make it somewhat more obvious that they entirely wrap their arguments, and are entitled to return whatever they want to). Regards, Martin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
