On 13 Jul, 22:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It seems a bit risky to use 'from scipy import *'. Maybe it's better > to use 'import scipy' and then scipy.arange, to be sure what is > actually being used? Would there be any disadvanages with that > approach, other than more use of the keyboard?
Generally the idiom from something import * is discouraged as it clutters the namespace (it can e.g. shadow globals). I prefer something like: import numpy as np Also I suggest you don't use SciPy and Matplotlib (pylab) unless you mean it. Import from numpy instead. Import pylab if you need graphs and scipy if you need something special that is not in numpy. Get the latest installer (or sources) from: Python 2.5.1: www.python.org NumPy 1.0.3: www.scipy.org SciPy 0.5.2: www.scipy.org Matplotlib 0.90.1: matplotlib.sourceforge.net PIL 1.1.6: www.pythonware.com/products/pil/ wxPython 2.8.4.0: www.wxpython.org gcc and gfortran (for scipy.wave): http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries At least that is what makes me as a scientist happy with Python :) Enthought and similar distros are in my experience "unclean". They don't always work and they are difficult to update. I rather download the binary installers (for Windows) and install the packages I need. I also suggest you buy a copy of "Guide to NumPy" by Travis Oliphant. http://www.tramy.us/guidetoscipy.html S.M. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
