On Jul 12, 7:10 pm, Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I won't dignify your insulting twaddle and random ad-hominem verbiage > > with any more responses after this one. Something with actual logical > > argumentation to rebut may be another matter of course. > > Er, why don't you just answer his question (what version)? He's asking > for actual information, which will help us understand what you are > (trying) to to say. > > If you continue to just make vague and unsupported (and rather hostile) > assertions, without examples, version numbers, or other concrete > information, do you expect anybody will continue listening to you?
Some people can't let sleeping dogs lie I guess. I can't remember the specific version after all these years. It may have been 18 or 19 point something. As for "concrete information" this thread is littered with fairly specific anecdotes. I know, I know; anecdotes aren't really proof of anything. Got any better suggestions? HCI stuff is a bit slippery to try to hang a rigorous theory and quantitative facts upon. For most people, a crappy interface isn't something they can precisely define, but they know it when they see it (or at least try to use it). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
