Steven D'Aprano schrieb:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:04:33 +0200, Stargaming wrote:
>
>
>
>>No, I think Bjoern just wanted to point out that all those binary
>>boolean operators already work *perfectly*. You just have to emphasize
>>that you're doing boolean algebra there, using `bool()`.
>>"Explicit is better than implicit."
>
>
>
> So we should always write things explicitly like:
>
> if bool(bool(some_condition) is True) is True:
> first_line = str(some_string).split(str("\n"))[int(0)]
> n = int(int(len(list(some_list))) + int(1))
> elif bool(bool(some_condition) is False) is True:
> f = float(math.sin(float(6.0)/float(math.pi)))
>
> instead of the less explicit code. I'll try to remember that, thank you
> for the advice.
>
>
>
You're missing like 400 bool(...) is True constructs there! Fatal error,
recursion depth reached. Aww!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
