On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 06:21:31 +0300, Simon Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jul 8, 7:43 pm, lex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Of course there is the always the iteration method: >> >> list = [1, True, True, False, False, True] >> status = True >> for each in list: >> status = status and each >> >> but what is your best way to test for for False in a list? > > > False in list > > all() is slightly faster -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
