Peter Decker wrote: > On 7/7/07, Kelvie Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ugh.. this would be a repost for the OP, but I forgot to hit "reply to >> all" again. > > <rant> > Imagine if you wrote applications where the default behavior did not > do what was needed 99% of the time: how long do you think you'd be in > business? > > The default behavior of replying to the original sender instead of the > list makes no sense. I've read the purist arguments against replying > to the list, but I subscribed to a *list*, not an individual sender. > > I know that this post is pointless, since the people who run this list > seem to care more about abstract and misdirected notions of purity > than making things as useful and intelligent as possible, but after > seeing dozens of "please keep your reply on list" responses recently, > I had to vent. > </rant>
Well, I hope you feel better now. regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden --------------- Asciimercial ------------------ Get on the web: Blog, lens and tag the Internet Many services currently offer free registration ----------- Thank You for Reading ------------- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
