Robert Kern wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:20:30 -0500
>>Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>>>Does it differ from the
>>>>built-in inf?
>>>
>>>What built-in inf?
>>
>>$ python
>>Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr 5 2007, 20:11:18)
>>[GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
>>Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>
>>>>>a = 1.0e1000
>>>>>b = 2.0e1000
>>>>>a
>>
>>inf
>>
>>>>>b
>>
>>inf
>>
>>>>>a == b
>>
>>True
>>
>>>>>type(a)
>>
>><type 'float'>
>
>
> Okay, I thought you meant that there was an actual symbol 'inf' in the
> builtins
> or in a module somewhere.
>
>
>>>No. You can make one that fits your requirements, though.
That sounds like a bug. If Python numerics don't define
+INF, -INF, and NaN, along with the tests for them, that's a
flaw in the language. We can assume IEEE floating point at this
late date; it's been standard for twenty years and Java assumes it.
John Nagle
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
