On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:11:39 +0100, Robin Becker wrote: > I have seen this sort of evolution strategy in the past and it's very wrong > to > attempt to simplify outside the genetic framework. The implication is that > you > know better than the overall fitness requirement. The additional expressions > and > redundancies allow for extra mutation and combination possibilities which is > a > good thing for the whole population. If you must, add the requirement to the > target ie give extra fitness points to organisms which perform efficiently.
I'm sorry, but there's something important I forgot to mention - I only want to do the simplification *after* a winning successful organism has evolved and satisfied the fitness function. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
