Roman Suzi wrote:
I think that if any object (from standard library at least) doesn't support iteration, it should clearly state so.
My guess is that 'for' causes the use of 'm[0]', which is (rightfully) an error...
Can this behaviour of email be considered a bug? Is there a good case to iterate over something useful in a message
Why would it be a bug if the documentation never stated that the object was iterable?
-- Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] && http://www.alcyone.com/max/ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis Wyrd has swept all my kin / all the brave chiefs away! / Now I must follow them! -- Beowulf -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
